Black v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Where the guilt of the accused is clearly established aliunde the error complained of, an error in the admission of evidence relating to other transactions and tending to show the guilt of the accused of other crimes than that for which he is on trial will not require a reversal. Miller v. Slate, 69 Ga. App. 847 (26 S. E. 2d, 851). See also Hagar v. State, 71 Ga. 164; Luby v. State, 102 Ga. 633, 648 (29 S. E. 494); Pascal v. State, 77 Ga. 596 (3 S. E. 2); Perry v. State, 102 Ga. 365 (30 S. E. 903); Lanier v. State, 106 Ga. 368 (32 S. E. 335). In this case, the evidence as a whole, together…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Hagar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Hodges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Lanier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Pascal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Diggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954