Abercrombie v. Ivey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
Guerry, J.
A ginner, employed by the owner “to operate this engine and these gins, to keep the gins clear and to see that the cotton is properly ginned,” assumes the ordinary risks incident to such work. Such an employee knows, or should know, as well as the master that it is dangerous to place his hand between the breast of the gins and the saws. When the gin becomes clogged, he knows as well as the master that there is danger in removing the motes, or whatever has clogged the gin, by putting his hand between the saws and the breast of the gin, even though the machinery is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Worlds v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Horne v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933