Legal Opinion
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 2016No. C073865PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, Acting P. J.
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) gave notice it intended to discipline its employee, parole agent Shiekh Iqbal (real party in interest), for unauthorized use of government resources to access criminal history information concerning a third party. The State Personnel Board (SPB) revoked the discipline on statute of limitations grounds under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBRA), Government Code section 3304. (Unless otherwise set forth, statutory references that follow are to the Government Code.) SPB ruled that statutory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lybarger v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Telish v. Cal. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Daugherty v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bacilio v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bacilio v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Carrasco v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Chaplin v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.