Legal Opinion

Paez-Fontana v. United States

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided July 17, 2014No. Civil No. 14-1327 (FAB); Criminal No. 11-224 (FAB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BESOSA, District Judge.

A district court may refer a pending motion to a magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Loc. Rule 72(b). Any party adversely affected by the report and recommendation may file written objections within fourteen days of being served with the magistrate judge’s report. Loc. Rule 72(d). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party that files a timely objection is entitled to a de novo determination of “those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which specific…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Contreras v. SomozaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
  2. Feliciano-Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API