St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co. v. State

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Defendant Las embraced its ten assignments of error within four propositions in its brief. Its first and second propositions are presented and argued together, and will be so considered here. These are:

“First, that the Corporation Commission was without jurisdiction or authority to enter Order No. 2148, and the same is contrary to law; second the Corporation Commission erred in holding that the transportation of crushed rock and shale from Lawrence, Okla., to Ada, Okla., was a switching service, and in refusing to apply .the uniform tariff rates for transportation service…