Union Pacific Railroad v. Public Service Commission
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Parker
Union Pacific Railroad Company has appealed from a judgment of the district court affirming an order of the Public Service Commission, which rejected the appellant’s petition seeking to close its agency station in Burns.1 Appellant contends that the order of the commission was contrary to law, constituted an abuse of discretion, and was arbitrary and capricious.
From the briefs and oral argument, it appears that there is substantial agreement between the railroad, the town of Burns, and the commission, that a primary criterion to be applied in determining whether or not an agency station…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Rydal-Meadowbrook Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Application of Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Nebraska Ex Rel. Nebraska State Railway Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1966
- Erie-Lackawanna Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Sinclair Oil Corp. v. WYOMING PSCWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Terrence Bowser v. Jerry Howell, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026