Legal Opinion

Murray v. Peckham

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 30, 1886Published

Exceptions to tbe Court of Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

This action was begun in the Justice Court of Newport and taken by the plaintiffs, by appeal, to the Court of Common Pleas. The appeal bond was executed in the name of the appellants by their attorney of record. In the Court of Common Pleas the action was dismissed for want of a proper bond, and comes here, on exceptions, for error in the dismissal.

We do not find any error. In Clarke v. Courser, 29 N. H. 170, it was decided, that an attorney, under a general authority to prosecute and defend suits for his client, is not authorized to execute an appeal bond in the client’s name, the law being…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte HolbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1825

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API