Legal Opinion

Moore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1898No. 895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Utah.

1Opinion of the Court

RINER, District Judge.

November 4, 1895, the plaintiff in error, with others, was indicted in the district court within and for the Third judicial district of the territory of Utah, Salt Lake county, for unlawfully engaging in a combination in restraint of trade and commerce in that territory. The indictment charged that the defendants therein named, “on the 22d day of October in the year of our Lord 1895, in the district and territory aforesaid, and within the jurisdiction of this court, did willfully and unlawfully engage in a combination in restraint of trade and commerce in said territory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Yeaton and Others, of the Schooner General Pinkney and Cargo v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Permoli v. Municipality No. 1 of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Cordova & Simonpietri Insurance Agency Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  3. Higgins v. Brown, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. United States v. Maldonado-BurgosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. Higgins v. Brown, JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API