Legal Opinion

Zellmer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 10, 2005No. A05A1333PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Michael Todd Zellmer appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Zellmer claims the trial court erred in denying his motion because he entered his plea under duress and because his trial counsel was ineffective. For the following reasons, we conclude there was no error and affirm. Zellmer pled guilty to armed robbery and voluntary manslaughter on June 4,2001. Within the same term of court, Zellmer filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Zellmer was appointed new defense counsel who argued that trial counsel was ineffective…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Zellmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pepe-Frazier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Gay v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  4. Lamb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API