Thompson v. . Gaylard
Superior Court of North Carolina
1Opinion
The money is dischargeable in plank, staves, and shingles. You must prove a tender of all the articles, not of some, only enough in value to discharge the debt. A tender of a certificate for timber lying on the bank of the river, and there inspected, is not a sufficient tender. The certificate is evidence, at most, only that lumber had been inspected, not that it was at the place of inspection at the time of the tender.
NOTE. — As to the first point, see Hodges v. Clinton, 1 N.C. and the refences [references] in the note.
Upon the question of tender see England v. Witherspoon, 2 N.C. 361;Bell…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bell v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1828
- Mills v. . HugginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831
- Mobley v. FossettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838