Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Dial

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1983No. 69090PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This is an original application for writ of mandamus. Art. 5, Sec. 5, Texas Constitution. Petitioner has filed this cause “to compel Respondent to authorize payment to Petitioner for services rendered by Petitioner as court-appointed appellate counsel.”

Petitioner, an attorney, was appointed by respondent, a district judge, to represent Robert Williams on the appeal of his conviction in cause 81-CR-2029 in the 175th Judicial District Court. Petitioner was compensated for his representation of Williams in the appeal of that conviction. Petitioner also represented Williams…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PaprskarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. State v. HensonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Olivo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Dean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Smith v. FlackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Ex Parte RieckCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API