Legal Opinion

State v. Stahl

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1979No. 3813PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of embezzling over $100. To have embezzled the money, defendant must have been entrusted with the money. Section 30-16-8, N.M.S.A.1978. Defendant contends there is no evidence that he was entrusted with over $100. We agree.

Defendant was a clerk at a store. The store had two cash registers and a drop-box. There was a slit in the counter; money pushed through this slit went into the drop-box. The drop-box was locked with two padlocks, the keys to which were retained by the manager. When money accumulated in the registers, portions of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. State v. PekeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. RheaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State v. KonviserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. RobertsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. ArchieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. KovachNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API