State v. Stahl
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant was convicted of embezzling over $100. To have embezzled the money, defendant must have been entrusted with the money. Section 30-16-8, N.M.S.A.1978. Defendant contends there is no evidence that he was entrusted with over $100. We agree.
Defendant was a clerk at a store. The store had two cash registers and a drop-box. There was a slit in the counter; money pushed through this slit went into the drop-box. The drop-box was locked with two padlocks, the keys to which were retained by the manager. When money accumulated in the registers, portions of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. PekeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. RheaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. KonviserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. RobertsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. EderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. ArchieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. KovachNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006