Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1978No. 39194PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Presiding Judge.

Movant, in this Rule 27.26 appeal, bases his complaint on ineffective assistance of counsel leading to his plea of guilty on three charges of armed robbery. He alleges that his trial counsel conferred with him only twice before day of trial and had failed to interview State witnesses.

Effectiveness of counsel goes only to the issue of whether or not the plea was voluntarily and knowingly made. Blade v. State, 558 S.W.2d 352 (Mo.App.1977). In Keller v. State, 566 S.W.2d 260 (Mo.App.1978), the issue relating to this case was stated, thus:. once a plea of guilty has been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Blade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Rogers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Chapman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Jett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Freeman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API