Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 20, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Baird

Affirming.

AY. Tanlbee Smith, circuit court clerk of Pike county, Ky., sued the Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph ¡Company, doing busines in Pikeville, Pike county, Ky., to compel it to furnish service to his public office in the-following manner:

“ (1) Telephone service confined to Pikeville exchange, with no toll calls either inbound or outbound, or
“(2) Both exchange and toll service, — (exempting him, however, from liability for tolls on inbound or outbound calls unless the Telephone Company shall first make sure that plantiff consents, to pay-tolls on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Schaake v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Southern Express Co. v. WhittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kentucky Industrial Utility Customers, Inc. v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Jackson County v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Indiana Forge & MacHine Co. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Benzinger, Police Judge v. Union Light, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Carr v. Cincinnati Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API