Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Hosmer

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment rendered at the Cayuga circuit on a trial before Dwight, J., without a jury-

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Talcott, J.

This is an action known as an action of replevin. The facts were agreed upon. *346The plaintiff’s horse was trespassing upon the premises of the defendant; whereupon the defendant took him into his possession as a trespasser about 8 o’clock A. me., and as such detained him, on the same premises. The plaintiff demanded .the horse of the defendant about noon. He refused to deliver the horse, upon the ground that he was detaining him as a trespasser, and in the afternoon of the same day the plaintiff commenced this suit.

[Fourth Department, General Term, at Buffalo, January 7,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Danihee v. HyattNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lynch v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Lynch v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API