Legal Opinion

Steel Dynamics Inc.-New Millennium v. Markham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 25, 2010No. 1D10-3279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation case, the employer/carrier (E/C) argues the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred by finding Claimant did not intentionally or knowingly make misrepresentations for the purpose of securing workers’ compensation benefits, and consequently by concluding Claimant is not disqualified from receiving all compensation under the provisions of section 440.09(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2007). Because competent substantial evidence (CSE) supports the JCC’s findings of fact regarding Claimant’s lack of wrongful intent, and further, because the E/C fails to raise any legal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Florida Detroit Diesel v. NathaiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. ManningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Bordelon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Doyle v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Dieujuste v. J. Dodd Plumbing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miami Dade County School Board v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Carroso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Miranda v. BridgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API