Commonwealth v. Millard
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Judge:
Appellant was convicted, after a jury trial, of burglary, 1 rape, 2 recklessly endangering another person, 3 felonious restraint, 4 terroristic threats, 5 and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. 6 Appellant’s post-verdict motions were dismissed, and he brings this appeal, claiming that 1) his motion to suppress was improperly denied; 2) his Rule 1100 rights were violated; 3) inflammatory evidence was admitted at trial; 4) his motion for mistrial, made when a Commonwealth witness allegedly testified concerning appellant’s exercise of his right to remain silent, was improperly…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Commonwealth v. NovakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. CasuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. YacoubianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.