Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Millard

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1979No. 1375PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

Appellant was convicted, after a jury trial, of burglary, 1 rape, 2 recklessly endangering another person, 3 felonious restraint, 4 terroristic threats, 5 and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. 6 Appellant’s post-verdict motions were dismissed, and he brings this appeal, claiming that 1) his motion to suppress was improperly denied; 2) his Rule 1100 rights were violated; 3) inflammatory evidence was admitted at trial; 4) his motion for mistrial, made when a Commonwealth witness allegedly testified concerning appellant’s exercise of his right to remain silent, was improperly…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. NovakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. CasuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. YacoubianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API