West v. Dooley
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Steven West petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the Department of Correction’s calculation of the time he must serve on two consecutive sentences. The dispute involves the manner of calculating good-conduct credit under SDCL 24-5-1. The habeas court affirmed the Department’s calculation, which applied the statutory formula to each sentence separately. West appeals, arguing that the total time to be served under both sentences should be aggregated before applying the statute. We affirm the Department’s calculation.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] On July…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grant v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- City of Deadwood v. M.R. Gustafson Family TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re B.Y. Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KoernerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Anderson v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Schuelke v. Belle Fourche Irrigation DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013