Garrett v. Enso Gutzeit O/Y
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
There remains in this case the determination of the third-party controversy between the shipowner and stevedore following the reversal of this Court’s action in setting aside a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the shipowner, and in entering judgment in favor of the shipowner. Garrett v. Gutzeit O/Y, 491 F.2d 228 (4 Cir. 1974). The judgment entered on the jury verdict in the sum of $45,000, plus interest and costs, including appellate costs, was ultimately satisfied by the shipowner who seeks indemnity for the amount paid to Garrett,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation v. Polskie Linie Oceaniczne, John H. Newby v. Polskie Linie OceaniczneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- George Garrett v. Enso Gutzeit O/yCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Samuel Mosley v. Cia. Mar. Adra S.A., and Third-Party v. Lipsett Steel Products, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Compania Trasatlantica Espanola, S.A. v. Carmen Melendez Torres, Etc., International Shipping Agency, Inc., Third-Party v. Carmen Melendez Torres, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.