Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Enso Gutzeit O/Y

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 17, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 75-71-NNPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.

There remains in this case the determination of the third-party controversy between the shipowner and stevedore following the reversal of this Court’s action in setting aside a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the shipowner, and in entering judgment in favor of the shipowner. Garrett v. Gutzeit O/Y, 491 F.2d 228 (4 Cir. 1974). The judgment entered on the jury verdict in the sum of $45,000, plus interest and costs, including appellate costs, was ultimately satisfied by the shipowner who seeks indemnity for the amount paid to Garrett,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation v. Polskie Linie Oceaniczne, John H. Newby v. Polskie Linie OceaniczneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. George Garrett v. Enso Gutzeit O/yCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  4. Samuel Mosley v. Cia. Mar. Adra S.A., and Third-Party v. Lipsett Steel Products, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Compania Trasatlantica Espanola, S.A. v. Carmen Melendez Torres, Etc., International Shipping Agency, Inc., Third-Party v. Carmen Melendez Torres, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API