Legal Opinion
Hoskins v. Citigroup, Inc. (In Re Viola)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 16, 2014No. 12-60032; BAP 11-1173UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Appellant Janina Hoskins, the chapter 7 trustee of the estate of Joseph John Viola, seeks partial review of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) opinion affirming the bankruptcy court’s order-dismissing the trustee’s second -amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The trustee seeks review only of the lower court’s determination that defendants were not “initial transferees” under 11 U.S.C. § 550(a). 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and, after de novo, review, we affirm. See Dennis v. Hart, 724 F.3d 1249, 1252 (9th Cir.2013);…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dennis Ex Rel. PICO Holdings, Inc. v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Robert Rodriguez v. At&t Mobility Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Boyajian v. New Falls Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Universal Service Administrative Co. v. Post-Confirmation Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Incomnet Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zazalli v. Swenson (In re DBSI, Inc.)District Court, D. Idaho · 2016
- Huntsberger v. Umpqua Holdings Corp. (In re Berjac of Oregon)District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Mark One CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2020