Legal Opinion

State v. Barron

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 18, 2012No. 29787-0-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 strip search requires probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime will be discovered, and it requires approval of a police supervisor. Here, the search was supported only by the defendant’s apparent nervousness. That is not enough. We reverse the conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver.

FACTS

¶2 Officer Thomas Orth of the Sunnyside Police Department responded to a report of an assault with a knife on September 6, 2010. He arrived at the scene and found Gabriela Barron and three others standing in the front yard of a house. Ms. Barron was crying…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morales v. City of BellinghamDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  2. State Of Washington v. Baron Adam DukesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. State Of Washington v. Kelly StultzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State Of Washington v. Lisa J. HurdeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State of Washington v. Rico Odell DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API