Legal Opinion

Flowers v. PERS

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided October 24, 2006No. 2005-CC-00198-COAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

952 So.2d 972 (2006)

Patricia FLOWERS, Appellant,

v.

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Appellee.

No. 2005-CC-00198-COA.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi.

October 24, 2006.

George S. Luter, attorney for appellant.

Mary Margaret Bowers, attorney for Appellee.

EN BANC.

MODIFIED OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING[1]

SOUTHWICK, J., for the Court.

¶ 1. The Public Employees Retirement System Board of Trustees (PERS) determined that Patricia Flowers was not suffering from a disability that would entitle her to retirement benefits. Flowers has filed procedurally proper appeals which today cause her issues to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McGowan v. Miss. State Oil & Gas Bd.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. PERS v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Dean v. Public Emp. Retirement SystemMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Burns v. PERS OF MISS.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stevison v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIRE. SYS.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  2. Case v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
  3. Public Employees' Retirement System v. DishmonMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Public Employees' Retirement System v. DishmonMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Public Employees' Retirement System v. Jannie M. DishmonMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API