Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Bank of America, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 26, 2014No. 2D12-1270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

When Bank of America voluntarily dismissed its foreclosure action against Jaime and Viviana Lopez, the Lopezes sought attorney’s fees pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(d), which addresses costs awardable to a defendant when a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses a case. But they had not pleaded entitlement to attorney’s fees in their answer to the bank’s complaint. The circuit court denied their motion for fees, and we affirm.

The Lopezes contend that they should be awarded attorney’s fees under rule 1.420(d) notwithstanding their failure to plead entitlement to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stockman v. DownsSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Thornber v. City of Ft. Walton BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. In Re Amendments to Guidelines for TaxationSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Wilson v. ROSE PRINTING COMPANY INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. AJAX PAVING INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Hardaway Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Creamer v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API