Legal Opinion

Meadows v. Village of Mineola

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. A. Johnson, J.

The defendant, Village of Mineóla, moves to dismiss for insufficiency complaints in five actions brought against it.

*816Each complaint alleges that the plaintiff owns premises in the village; that the village is a municipal corporation; that the village had the duty under its planning and zoning ordinance and building codé of inspecting newly constructed dwellings before issuing certificates of occupancy therefor; that the village authorities, in disregard of their duty, “ negligently and carelessly ” issued certificates of occupancy certifying that plaintiffs’ premises conform substantially to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steitz v. City of BeaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Stubley v. Allison Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Valenti v. Mosholu Housing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoffert v. Owatonna Inn Towne Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Hannon v. CounihanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Modlin v. Washington Avenue Food Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Lockwood v. Village of Buchanan, New York County Courts1959
  5. Carroll v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API