Legal Opinion

Kelly v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1913No. 2369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of bigamy and his penalty fixed at the lowest prescribed by law.

There is no statement of facts. However, appellant has one contention in the case and presents one question necessary to review, and that is, he claims that the case should be reversed because he was not furnished a statement of facts free of any cost to him and without his giving security therefor.

The record shows that after the conviction and after the overruling of his motion for new trial he filed a motion, which he swore to, requesting the court to require the official stenographer…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API