Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 22, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

' Writ of error to the Criminal-Court of Eecord for Volusia County; Bert Fisb, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, C. J.

Charley Bennett seeks relief here from a conviction of the crime of larceny. Ten errors are assigned, but we shall discuss only those which are-argued, treating the others as having been abandoned. See Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 South. Rep. 656, and Pittman v. State, 51 Fla. 94, 41 South. Rep. 385, 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 509.

The fourth and fifth assignments are argued together and are as follows:

“Fourth. The Court erred in permitting witness for State E. L. Smith to testify as to statements made by defendant while executing a search warrant over the objection of attorney for defendant.

F…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Putnal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API