Legal Opinion
Claim of Collins v. Aluminum Co. of America
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Said order affirmed three decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board: one, which found that the "claim for compensation was timely filed by the claimant within ninety days after he first had knowledge that the disease was totally disabling and was due to the nature of the employment, in accordance with the provisions of section 44-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law”; a second, "based on the medical report and testimony of Dr. Brock, Expert Chest Consultant, that the claimant’s occupational…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Casey v. Hinkle Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Claim of Ernest v. Boggs Lake Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Riley v. Aircraft Products Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Claim of Dorb v. Frederick Stearns & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- MATTER OF SLADE v. PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. AerospaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Claim of Depczynski v. Adsco/Farrar & TreftsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Claim of McIntosh v. International Business Machines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Claim of Jones v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Claim of Scheulen v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984