Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 23, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00799Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ELIZABETH LUCAS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-C-799 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 59(e) allows a court to alter or amend a judgment “only if the petitioner can demonstrate a manifest error of law or present newly discovered evidence.” Obriecht v. Raemisch,

517 F.3d 489, 494

(7t…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
Obriecht v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
Foster v. DeLucaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
Sigsworth v. City Of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
Lb Credit Corporation v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Concordia Federal Bank for SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.