Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Daniel Ramos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 16, 1993No. 92-50685Published
1Opinion of the Court
5 F.3d 543
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose Daniel RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-50685.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 4, 1993.*
Decided Aug. 16, 1993.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Edwin MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alex BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- People of the Territory of Guam v. Vincent T. TedtaotaoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990