Town of Topsham v. Town of Williamstown
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal from order of removal of one Sally J. T. Ring, a pauper. Heard on an agreed statement, June Term, 1886, Eowell, J., presiding. Judgment that the pauper was unduly removed. Affirmed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from order of removal of one Sally J. T. Ring, a pauper. Heard on an agreed statement, June Term, 1886, Eowell, J., presiding. Judgment that the pauper was unduly removed. Affirmed. It was agreed that said Sally was bom and always lived or bad ber borne in Topsbam until ber marriage in 1869, and ever since, as hereafter appears ; that ber household goods remained there until the most of -them were sold by the overseer of the poor in said town in October, 1884; that the pauper was insane all the time from the appointment of a guardian, in 1872, and was controlled and supported by the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Ross, J.
By the agreed facts, the pauper, Sally J. T. Ring, before her marriage, had her legal settlement in the town of Topsham. December 25, 1869, she married Moses Ring, whose legal settlement was in the town of Williamstown. During their married life to December 20, 1871, when he died, they resided in the town of Topsham. After his death she remained sane, and had her residence in Topsham, until May 14, 1872, when she was adjudged to be insane and a guardian of her person and property was appointed, by the Probate Court. She remained insane from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Middlebury v. WalthamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
- Irvine v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
- Town of Londonderry v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1829
- Town of Pittsford v. Town of ChittendenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
- Town of Randolph v. Town of BraintreeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.