Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Borzelleca

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the orders dated December 6, 2004, that granted the motions filed by Edward Bor-zelleca and Michael Fithian requesting the dismissal of the charges filed against them in Delaware County pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 110 (compulsory joinder rule). 1 Although these orders are interlocutory, they are immediately appealable. Commonwealth v. Pries, 861 A.2d 951 (Pa.Super.2004).

¶ 2 We begin by reciting the facts as set forth by the trial court in its opinion written pursuant to Pa.R.A.P.1925(a):

On June 24, 2003, Michael Boudwin, a Detective working…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. FailorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API