Commonwealth v. Borzelleca
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BENDER, J.:
¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the orders dated December 6, 2004, that granted the motions filed by Edward Bor-zelleca and Michael Fithian requesting the dismissal of the charges filed against them in Delaware County pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 110 (compulsory joinder rule). 1 Although these orders are interlocutory, they are immediately appealable. Commonwealth v. Pries, 861 A.2d 951 (Pa.Super.2004).
¶ 2 We begin by reciting the facts as set forth by the trial court in its opinion written pursuant to Pa.R.A.P.1925(a):
On June 24, 2003, Michael Boudwin, a Detective working…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. FailorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008