Legal Opinion

United States v. Karl Bernard Bell

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 18, 2012No. 12-11807UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Karl Bell, a federal prisoner serving two concurrent life sentences for distributing crack cocaine, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his “Motion for Clarification” and denial of his later motion for reconsideration of that dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). 1

I

Bell filed a “Motion for Clarification” in the district court on April 21, 2011 asserting that the court lacked jurisdiction to impose two concurrent life sentences because the government did not file proper notice that it was seeking such a sentence. The district court denied that motion, and Bell appealed. This Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Tempur-Pedic International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Green Leaf Nursery v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Norelus v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Lawson v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Harris v. United Automobile Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fernandez v. Mattress Xperts Broward, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API