Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bell v. Yellow Cab Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1960No. Appeal, 286Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell:

Plaintiff recovered a verdict against defendant in the sum of $29,150 for personal injuries. The Court en banc — because, considering the record as a whole, the verdict was grossly excessive — remitted that part of the verdict in excess of $17,000 and upon plaintiff’s refusal to file the suggested remittitur granted a new trial. From the Order granting a new trial, plaintiff took this appeal.

In considering — not the grant of a new trial but— the entry of a judgment non obstante veredicto, it is hornbook law that an appellate Court considers only the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. ElgartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Smith v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API