Bell v. Yellow Cab Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell:
Plaintiff recovered a verdict against defendant in the sum of $29,150 for personal injuries. The Court en banc — because, considering the record as a whole, the verdict was grossly excessive — remitted that part of the verdict in excess of $17,000 and upon plaintiff’s refusal to file the suggested remittitur granted a new trial. From the Order granting a new trial, plaintiff took this appeal.
In considering — not the grant of a new trial but— the entry of a judgment non obstante veredicto, it is hornbook law that an appellate Court considers only the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Sherwood v. ElgartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Smith v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.