Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Queen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 1972No. 71-143Published

1Dissent

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE STOUDER

dissenting:

I do not agree with the majority of the court. In my opinion prejudicial trial errors occurred requiring a new trial.

As indicated in the majority opinion the jury after deliberating some time delivered a note to the bailiff who in turn delivered the note to the trial judge. The note read, ‘Would like the Defendant’s words on the stand.” Whatever transpired upon receipt of the note was not transcribed by the court reporter and the only reference to what may have happened is contained in a supplemental record filed by the State which contains an account…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. The PEOPLE v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API