Hoxie v. Iiams
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J. cited: Parsons on Gout., 7th Ed., vol. Ill, pp. 357, 358; White v. Day et al., 56 Iowa, 250; Hammons v. Bigelow, 17 N. E. Eep. 193; Nelson v. Nelson, 38 N.W. Eep. 134; Babcock v. Case, 61 Pa. St. 427; Morse v. Brackett, 98 Mass. 210; Taymon v. Mitchell, 1 Md.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J. cited: Parsons on Gout., 7th Ed., vol. Ill, pp. 357, 358; White v. Day et al., 56 Iowa, 250; Hammons v. Bigelow, 17 N. E. Eep. 193; Nelson v. Nelson, 38 N.W. Eep. 134; Babcock v. Case, 61 Pa. St. 427; Morse v. Brackett, 98 Mass. 210; Taymon v. Mitchell, 1 Md. Ch. Dec. 497; Tisdale v. Buchmore, 33 Me. 462; Bugbee v. Haynes, 43 Vt. 476. cited: Led-yard v. Manning, 1 Ala. 153; Oelrichs v. Artz, 21 Md. 524; Stanton v. Small, 3 Sandf. (N. Y.) 230; Edwards v. Fire Ins. Co., 3 Gill. (Md.) 176; Johnson v. Cranage, 7 N. W.…
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
This was an action brought in the district court of Lancaster county by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error on a written contract set out in the petition. The plaintiff in said action alleges in his petition that on July 6,1885, he entered into a contract with the defendant therein for an exchange of certain property, by the terms of which *618the said plaintiff, for the consideration thereinafter expressed, agreed to convey to the said defendant certain real estate in the city of Lincoln, and in consideration therefor defendant on his part contracted to convey to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gilbert v. MoodyNew York Supreme Court · 1837