Hellman v. Burritt
Supreme Court of Connecticut
New Haven & Fairfield Cos., Oct. T., 1892. Andrews, C. J., Carpenter, Torrance and Fenn, Js. Suit for the foreclosure of tax-liens; brought to the District Court of Waterbury, and reserved, upon a finding of the facts, for the advice of this court.
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, C. J.
The complaint in this case claims judg-. ment for the amount of certain tax liens—two in favor of the town of Waterbury, two in favor of the city of Waterbury, and two in favor of the First School District of Waterbury ; and for a strict foreclosure or a sale of the premises. covered by the liens. The complaint is in two counts.’ The first one is predicated on a tax laid by said communities in the year 1888, and the second count on a tax laid in the year 1889. Tn each instance the tax was laid against Angelo C. Burritt. The said Burritt, his wife Clara M. Burritt, and the Chelsea Savings Bank…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Meyer v. TrubeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schierbaum v. SchemmeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- City of Hartford v. Hartford Theological SeminarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Town of Hamden v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Empire Estates, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- F. H. Whittelsey Co. v. Town of Windsor LocksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916