Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'n

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1993No. 980 C.D. 1991Published

1DissentDoyle, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion principally because I disagree with the Court’s new resolve to change the judicial standard of review in police arbitration awards under Act 1111 and apply the much broader standard of review, judgment non obstante veredicto,2 which will not only erase extensive past precedent of this Court,3 which it may do, but *509which will also attempt to “reverse” a decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which this Court may not do.4 I further disagree with several other conclusions reached by the majority, which will be addressed seriatim.

For a better…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Community College v. Community College, Society of the FacultySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API