Legal Opinion
Bernhard v. Central Parking System of New York, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 18, 2012No. 10-cv-5596 (ADS)(ETB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs Nicholas Bernhard, Ralph Natale, Kirk Conway, and Roy Kohn (“the Plaintiffs”), as Trustees of the Health Fund 917 and the Local 917 Pension Fund (“the Funds” or “the Plaintiff Funds”), brought the present action pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The action is to enforce the obligation of the Defendant Central Parking System of New York, Inc. to make contributions to the Plaintiff Funds under the terms of their collective bargaining agreements and/or under the trust agreement…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Finkel v. RomanowiczCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amaya v. Roadhouse Brick Oven Pizza, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Natale v. Central Parking Systems of New York, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Bunay Villa v. Prima Contracting Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Constrafor, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Signature BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Daus v. Janover LLC Cafeteria PlanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.