Hall Contracting of Kentucky Inc. v. Huff

NICKELL, JUDGE,

CONCURRING:

Respectfully, I •¡concur with the majority. However, I write separately tb provide further explanation.

Though vigilantly respectful of the prohibition against substituting an appellate court’s factual findings for those of the trier, here, “when the curtain of conclusions and abstract contentions is removed, there is no substantial conflict in the evi*815dence” and the question is clearly one of law. Ratliff v. Redmon, 396 S.W.2d 320, 327 (Ky. 1966). While the General Assembly no longer requires, liberal construction of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), our judiciary…