Whitehill & Son v. Dacus & Jordan
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Benet, J., Greenville, December, 1895. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. cite: 39 S. C., 498; 7 R. I., 470; 75 Am. Dec., 248; 15 S. F. R., 199; 59 Fed. Rep., 999. cite: 39 S. C., 498; 7 Cranch, 19; 29 Barb., 383.
1Dissent
Mr. Chiee Justice McIver,
dissenting. The facts are so fully stated in the leading opinion of Mr. Justice Jones, that I do not deem it necessary to restate them here, as it is conceded that all of the facts material to the issue and all the principles of law involved are the same in all of the cases, I shall, for convenience of phraseology, speak of them as one case, intending that the view which I shall present. shall-be applicable to each of the cases stated in the title.
The case is treated by Mr. Justice Jones as a case in equity and not as a case at law, though this may well be questioned.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Western Bank v. SherwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1859