State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRK, Judge.
Appellant challenges the sufficiency' of the evidence to support her conviction of first-degree assault, arguing that she did not commit assault-harm because she did not intend to inflict bodily harm when she pushed the-complainant twice and he fell into a nearby fire. She also argues that her pushing did not constitute an -assault because it did not inflict bodily harm. Because pushing is a volitional act and when committed in a hostile and forceful manner, is an assault, regardless of whether harm was intended, and appellant’s pushes were a. substantial factor in causing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. LindahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. GatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore DornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Otto v. Wright CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017