Legal Opinion

Otto v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 2003No. 1801-99, 1802-99PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOMACK, J.,

filed an opinion,

in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, J.J., joined.

The appellants were convicted of organized criminal activity 1 for planning the aggravated kidnapping 2 of two victims, Joe and Margaret Ann Rowe. On appeal, the appellants challenged the validity of them conviction for organized criminal activity indictment. The State replied that the law of parties 3 applies to this element, so that the appellants may be held liable for organized criminal activity by encouraging or soliciting another party to the offense to commit the overt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. McLaren v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Longoria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Barrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  3. In re L.A.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Pardue v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  5. Jeannie Coutta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API