Legal Opinion

Barth v. St. Jude Med., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2018No. ED 106157PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JUDGE

In this action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision occurring on a private parking lot, Peter Barth argues the trial court erred in not submitting his proposed comparative-fault instruction, which hypothesized failure to yield the right-of-way as a ground to assess fault to the defendant. We affirm because Mr. Barth did not propose an acceptable instruction defining the phrase "yield the right-of-way," and we decline his invitation to recognize a new common-law right-of-way rule.

Factual and Procedural Background

Peter Barth and Brooke Cannon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Marion v. MarcusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Cluck v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. American Equity Mortgage, Inc. v. VinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Doolin v. SwainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrew Denney v. Syberg's Westport, Inc., d/b/a Syberg'sMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Lisa Ann Ford and David Jacob Ford v. Ford Motor CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Vicky Church, Sarah Austin and Jacob Church, on behalf of all Beneficiaries v. CNH Industrial America, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API