Legal Opinion

Young v. Nix

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 13, 1985No. 0465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

J. P. Young instituted this partition action in which J. E. Nix was allowed to interplead and assert a claim of adverse possession. The trial court ruled that Nix’s possession was permissive and not hostile and granted summary judgment in favor of Young. We agree and affirm.

In 1912 M. M. Nix acquired title to a large tract of land in Laurens County. He divided this property into three tracts in 1921 and then deeded one tract to each of his three grandchildren, Nora Young, James Fred Nix and A. R. Nix.

Nora Young died in the mid-1920’s. Although the property had been divided by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradley v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. All Saints Parish v. Protestant Episcopal Church in DioceseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API