Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jamison v. Fink

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

— The action is upon an attachment bond by a successful interpleader against the plaintiff in the attachment suit and his sureties. The attachment was levied November 24, 1890, and the interplea was filed December 8,1890. The interpleader claimed title to the goods attached under a chattel mortgage, securing the payment of a note executed by the defendant in the attachment, which note bore date November 22, 1890, and is payable one day after date, with eight per cent, compound interest per *627annum. During the pendency of the attachment suit, the goods were sold by the sheriff, and realized…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hewson v. TootleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Nelson Distilling Co. v. HubbardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Clark v. BrottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. Finke v. PikeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank of Newkirk v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Citizens Trust Co. v. EldersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. State ex rel. Adams v. FinkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. St. Louis Brewing Ass'n v. DrulingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API