Legal Opinion · Dissent

International Multifoods Corp. v. Mardian

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1985No. 14868, 14878Published

1DissentWuest, Acting Justice

I dissent from that part of the majority opinion which holds that the defendants/appellants waived any possible defenses they might have been able to assert on behalf of the principal. The plain language of the guaranties * relied upon by the majority relates to setoffs and counterclaims. The main defense is failure of consideration which is not a setoff or counterclaim.

SDCL 56-1-18 is controlling and provides:

The obligation of a guarantor must be neither larger in amount nor in other respects more burdensome than that of the principal, and if in its terms it exceeds it, it is reducible in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walcutt v. Clevite Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Midcontinent Broadcasting Co. v. Ava Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Richter v. Industrial Finance Co. Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Merchants' National Bank of Ocala v. Citizens' State Bank of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Fed. Dep. Ins. Corp. v. StenslandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API