Legal Opinion
Krull v. Somoza
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 16, 1994No. B14-92-00638-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
This is an appeal of a forcible entry and detainer action. We affirm. On September 15, 1988, Charles Krull, (Krull), entered into a 3 year property lease with Joseph Maxwell and the Maxwell Corporation, (Maxwell). The lease contained an option to renew, which Krull claims he exercised on April 4, 1991, and which Maxwell claims was never received. In early to mid 1991, Krull contracted to sell his business to “The Somoza Group.” 1 Before closing, Krull placed The Somoza Group in possession of the subject property. Closing never occurred. The lease between Krull and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cunningham v. Parkdale BankTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Chang v. Resolution Trust Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Baker v. John Peter Smith Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Rushing v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Hanks v. Lake Towne Apartments, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Elite Towing, Inc. v. LSI Financial Group, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Carlson's Hill Country Beverage, L.C. v. Westinghouse Road Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Galtex Property Investors, Inc. v. City of Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Maswoswe v. Nelson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
- Susan Jackson Holden and Terry Holden v. Charles Lyle Holden, as the Independent of the Estate of Rosie Eunice HoldenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.