Legal Opinion

Cornick v. Arthur

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Tom Green. Tried below before Hon. J. W. Timmins. Mrs. Cornicle and others prosecute writ of error from a judgment for defendants in their suit against Arthur and others.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

This is a suit of trespass to try title brought by plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, to wit, Mrs. Louise Cornicle, joined by her husband Boyd Cornicle, Bige Duncan and Gus Thomas against defendants in error, as defendants below, to wit, S. D. Arthur, J. J. Arthur and B. D. Arthur, in District Court of Tom Green County, Texas, for recovery of the land described in plaintiff’s petition; plaintiffs also prayed for a mandatory injunction to compel defendants to remove from said premises a dam, which they alleged defendants had constructed across Dove Creek, where the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mud Creek Irrigation, Agricultural, & Manufacturing Co. v. VivianTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pinkum v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Barrett v. MetcalfeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Mission v. PopplewellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gillett v. Van HorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. WimberlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Pouns v. ZacheryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. John A. Lance, Debra L. Lance, F.D. Franks and Helen Franks v. Judith and Terry Robinson, Gary and Brenda Fest, Virginia Gray and Butch Townsend, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API