Brooklyn Daily Eagle v. Bertin Dellmar, Ltd.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan.
1Per curiam
The defendant, who manufactures and sells a preparation for the hair, employed one Grotty, as salesman. He sold to the firm of Abraham & Strauss a quantity of the article manufactured by defendant, and agreed with said Abraham & Strauss that the defendant would advertise the wares in the plaintiff’s newspaper. Grotty had no express authority from the defendant to make any such agreement, and no such authority is to be implied from his employment as salesman. Tarpey v. Bernheimer, 16 N. Y. Supp. 870; Beck v. Donohue, 27 Misc. Rep. 230. It does not appear that Grotty ever notified the defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Beck v. DonohueAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Tarpy v. BernheimerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892