Legal Opinion

Bruder v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1929No. 27,146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Plaintiff appealed from a judgment.

Action for specific performance of a claimed contract for the conveyance of certain real estate and for damages in case specific performance cannot be granted. The judgment decreed that no valid contract was entered into between plaintiff and the board of education of the city of Minneapolis (hereinafter called the board) and that plaintiff was not entitled to a conveyance, damages or to any other relief.

The hoard, consisting of seven members, is a municipal corporation created by c. XVIII of the charter of Minneapolis. It is empowered by § 1 of that chapter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. O'Neil v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Arkansas Light & Power Co. v. CooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Natural Gas & Fuel Corp. v. Norphlet Gas & Water Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Hunter v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Madison, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  2. Town of Madison, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API